Jul 05
2010
|
No. 36: Who owns the supplies ordered off of a grant that is now expired?Posted by: PIA in Tagged in: Untagged
|
|
Sign Up to receive free weekly articles like these
Preview of next week's PI eAlert
Grant Clinic
Who owns the supplies ordered off of a grant that is now expired?
Reader Question: I understand that equipment ordered off a grant that has expired is owned by the institution responsible for administering the grant, but is the same true for supplies? For example, could I sell my old unused zip drives on eBay? Should the proceeds from that sale go back to the institution? Or back to the funding agency?
Expert Comment: Whose grant is it? Go ask that of your grants administrator or your dean of research and you will be told, “It's our grant” (along with the implied, “...and don’t you forget it!”). Yes, your institution owns every bit of it, down to the last pencil you bought with the direct-costs funding. It all belongs to them.
Specifically, the institution owns the equipment (items costing $5,000 or more and have an estimated two-year life) purchased by a federal grant. (Items costing less than $5,000 are considered “supplies.”)
When the grant period ends, the institution can give the equipment to another PI to do research or use the equipment for educational purposes. Of course, if a PI moves during the life of the grant, the equipment can be transferred to the new institution with the approval of both institutions. In either event, it will be logged in and tagged with a unique identifier that goes into the institute’s data base of inventory. The organization can lend it to another researcher or let it remain on a shelf, unused, which is very often what happens.
As for the supplies, they should not be sold for profit. If they are still usable after the grant ends, they stay with the institution. With approval from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), you can sell some items, but the monies must be put back into the grant as "program income" and the monies must be used for grant research purposes.
The best practice is to keep the supplies with the originating institution.
(I thank Jerome Itinger, director of grants and contracts at the College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, for helping to clarify this point).
Comments by William Gerin, PhD, P.I. e-Alert's chief grants consultant, professor of biobehavioral health, Pennsylvania State University, and author of Writing the NIH Grant Proposal: A Step-by-Step Process (SAGE Books, 2006)
This eAlert is brought to you as an informational training tool by the Principal Investigators Association, which is an independent organization. Neither the eAlert nor its contents have any connection with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the National Science Foundation (NSF), nor are they endorsed by these agencies. All views expressed are those personally held by the author and are not official government policies or opinions.
written by Observer, July 08, 2010
written by Glen Lafferty, July 08, 2010
"If there is a residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5,000 in aggregate fair market value upon termination or completion of the grant, and if the supplies are not needed for other federally sponsored programs or projects, the grantee may either retain them for use on other than federally sponsored activities or sell them, but, in either case, the grantee shall compensate the NIH awarding office for its share as a credit to the grant."
written by nm, July 08, 2010
never heard of anyone quibbling over supplies - most places do not even have systems in place to track supplies
written by PI in London, July 08, 2010
regarding who owns the left overs, strictly speaking I guess its the institiution but I dont think i''ve ever heard of organisations squablling over small items like zip drives.
written by som, July 08, 2010
written by LN, Director Sponsored Programs, private institution, July 08, 2010
written by Eli Rabett, July 08, 2010
written by RGE, July 08, 2010
written by rhp, July 09, 2010
written by a grants administartor, July 11, 2010
Program income is a nightmare, I've been down that road and would avoid it all costs in the future.
written by College Professor, July 12, 2010
- a Professor
written by Frederick Sweet, August 10, 2010