“There is no form of prose more difficult to understand and more tedious to read than the average scientific paper.” Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA, wrote this in 1994 in his book The Astonishing Hypothesis. Crick and many of his colleagues were acknowledging then what every scientist knows today: many scientific communications are largely unreadable. This has caused known problems for scientists world-wide, for their careers and for the delay in disseminating their unique findings to the world. The rapid increase in science specialization, complexity, and new language have been largely to blame. But I believe that scientists largely lack the training needed to simplify their language. As science becomes increasingly more specialized and complex, for many scientists, it becomes even more difficult to communicate with their readers in clear and simple terms.
This 90-page guide has been designed to help investigators, in any field, understand the root of poor writing, identify red flags within their own writing style, and craft clear, concise, powerful pieces that meet the requirements of the most demanding audiences within their professional careers. This guide includes:
About the Author: Christopher Dant is a faculty instructor at Dartmouth Medical School and the Norris Cotton Cancer Center. His PhD was concentrated in cellular and molecular biology. Early in his postgraduate career, he apprenticed with a Senior Editor at Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and went on to work as a biomedical writer for life sciences investigators in academia, private industry, and government agencies. Before coming INTRODUCTORY RATE UNTIL NOV. 27TH! 4 Easy Ways to Order: 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. |
This guide is brought to you as a training tool by the Principal Investigators Association, which is an independent organization. The information presented and its contents are not connected with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the National Science Foundation (NSF), nor are they endorsed by these agencies. All views expressed are those personally held by the author and are not official government policies or opinions. |